These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967526)

  • 1. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
    Huntoon LR
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
    McDonnell MF
    MedGenMed; 2006 Feb; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16915164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
    Majerus J
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
    Wright J
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
    Gluckmann ET
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
    Kramer SN
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
    Blumsohn A
    MedGenMed; 2006 Mar; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16915213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific blues.
    Nat Immunol; 2006 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 16357846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is peer review in crisis?
    Mulligan A
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. It is time to learn the lessons from Stoke.
    Hall D
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1346-7; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11090526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. So what is a sham peer review?
    Chalifoux R
    MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):47; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 16614669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manuscript review in family medicine.
    Worthington RC; Jones JG
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):359. PubMed ID: 8349050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ups and downs of peer review.
    Benos DJ; Bashari E; Chaves JM; Gaggar A; Kapoor N; LaFrance M; Mans R; Mayhew D; McGowan S; Polter A; Qadri Y; Sarfare S; Schultz K; Splittgerber R; Stephenson J; Tower C; Walton RG; Zotov A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17562902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer Review in Scientific Scholarship.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 29028479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is peer review effective?
    Handler S
    Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.