These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967528)
1. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review". Majerus J MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review". Huntoon LR MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review". McDonnell MF MedGenMed; 2006 Feb; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16915164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review". Wright J MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?". Gluckmann ET MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?". Kramer SN MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?". Blumsohn A MedGenMed; 2006 Mar; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16915213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of a peer review process among interns at an Australian hospital. Mathews PW; Owen C; Ramsey W; Corrigan G; Bassett M; Wenzel J Aust Health Rev; 2010 Nov; 34(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 21108913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review--why and how to do it. Jackson SA Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience. Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of RADPEERâ„¢ in the Joint Commission ongoing practice performance evaluation. Steele JR J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jan; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 21211756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing performance with peer appraisal. Fernsebner B OR Manager; 1992 Jan; 8(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10116043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The supervisor's performance appraisal: evaluating the evaluator. McConnell CR Health Care Superv; 1992 Sep; 11(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 10120039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is peer review in crisis? Mulligan A Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. It is time to learn the lessons from Stoke. Hall D BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1346-7; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11090526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. So what is a sham peer review? Chalifoux R MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):47; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 16614669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]