321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967565)
1. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa.
McGregor M; Moore R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Canada's abortion law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Martin SL
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):339-84. PubMed ID: 11651094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and international law: the status and possible extension of women's right to privacy.
Michel AE
J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):241-61. PubMed ID: 11655655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change.
Cavanagh D
Lib Life Fam; 1996; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
Kolner SJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
Kissling F
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
Walen A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
Tapovatz WE
St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
Davis PC; Gilligan C
McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law.
Funk N
Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On abortion: a Lincolnian position.
McKenna G
Atl Mon; 1995 Sep; 276(3):51-54, 56, 58-61, 64, 66-68. PubMed ID: 11660130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
Ching B
Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and morality revisited.
Fox-Genovese E
Hum Life Rev; 1997; 23(3):50-9. PubMed ID: 11657121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After Roe.
Neuhaus RJ
Natl Rev; 1989 Apr; 41(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 11659127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can technology solve the abortion dilemma?
Maguire MR
Christ Century; 1976 Oct; 93(34):918-9. PubMed ID: 11663690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion: state action.
Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
