426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16968378)
1. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
Isidor F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review.
Chang M; Chronopoulos V; Mattheos N
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 23918506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Ohto T; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 10874809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Ohto T; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 12074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peri-implant bone loss caused by occlusal overload: repair of the peri-implant defect following correction of the traumatic occlusion. A case report.
Tawil G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 18416428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current trends in implantology: Part 1--Biological response, implant stability, and implant design.
Saadoun AP; Le Gall MG; Touati B
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 16(7):529-35; quiz 536, 521. PubMed ID: 15485167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extent of peri-implantitis-associated bone loss.
Fransson C; Wennström J; Tomasi C; Berglundh T
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 36(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 19426183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of submucosal forces transmitted to dental implants.
Emmer TJ; Emmer TJ; Vaidyanathan J; Vaidyanathan TK
J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 10551146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes.
Bryant SR
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):470-90. PubMed ID: 9922739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TiO2 grit-blasted implant restoration. A controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part II: Histology and histomorphometry.
Bousdras VA; Walboomers F; Jansen JA; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Jaecques S; Naert IE; Sindet-Pedersen S; Goodship AE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18031442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: a histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Motomura Y; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 9796152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature.
Duyck J; Vandamme K
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Oct; 41(10):783-94. PubMed ID: 24889500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of plaque and/or excessive loading on marginal soft and hard tissue reactions around Brånemark implants: a review of literature and experience.
De Smet E; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Aug; 21(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11519707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
