These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16968650)

  • 1. The effects of tethering rear -facing child restraint systems on ATD responses.
    Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD; Ritchie NL; Schneider LW
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2006; 50():397-410. PubMed ID: 16968650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
    Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts.
    Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():61-81. PubMed ID: 33636003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.
    Patton DA; Mansfield JA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 36657143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A current assessment of the THOR 50M in rear impacts.
    White SD; Salmon JL; Prasad P; Burnett RA; Kim A; Buckman J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):208-212. PubMed ID: 36943173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the front row seatback in frontal impact sled tests.
    Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 35713941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of seatback characteristics on cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts.
    Burnett R; Carter J; Roberts V; Myers B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Jul; 36(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 15094412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
    Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
    Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of seatback deformation on out-of-position front-seat occupants in severe rear impacts.
    Burnett RA; Parenteau CS; White SD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 36441165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misuse study of latch attachment: a series of frontal sled tests.
    Menon R; Ghati Y
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():129-54. PubMed ID: 18184489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of various rear facing child restraint systems in a frontal crash.
    Sherwood CP; Abdelilah Y; Crandall JR; Stevens SL; Saggese JM; Eichelberger MR
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2004; 48():303-21. PubMed ID: 15319132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the relationship between vehicle interior geometry and child restraint systems.
    Sherwood CP; Abdelilah Y; Crandall JR
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2006; 50():381-96. PubMed ID: 16968649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of pediatric injuries and child restraint system.
    Kumar S; Harcourt J; Herbst B; Strickland D
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2012; 48():232-8. PubMed ID: 22846288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes.
    Belwadi A; Sarfare S; Tushak S; Maheshwari J; Menon S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S143-S144. PubMed ID: 31725355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts.
    Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.