218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16969601)
1. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.
Borden ZS; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Agriantonis DJ; Hinshaw JL
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 20032148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate.
Keedy AW; Yee J; Aslam R; Weinstein S; Landeras LA; Shah JN; McQuaid KR; Yeh BM
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):156-64. PubMed ID: 21873253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.
Gryspeerdt S; Lefere P; Herman M; Deman R; Rutgeerts L; Ghillebert G; Baert F; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jun; 15(6):1192-202. PubMed ID: 15702335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.
Theis J; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Muñoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26830606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance.
Liedenbaum MH; Denters MJ; de Vries AH; van Ravesteijn VF; Bipat S; Vos FM; Dekker E; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):W31-7. PubMed ID: 20566777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Hinshaw JL; Taylor AJ; Mukherjee R; Pfau PR
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 17259833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.
Hara AK; Kuo MD; Blevins M; Chen MH; Yee J; Dachman A; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley K; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 21512073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality.
Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography.
Cai W; Zalis ME; Näppi J; Harris GJ; Yoshida H
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3259-77. PubMed ID: 18697551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance.
Juchems MS; Ernst A; Johnson P; Virmani S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 18343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy.
Meric K; Bakal N; Aydin S; Yesil A; Tekesin K; Simsek M
Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 25895857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Pot D; Peringa J; Bipat S; Florie J; van Gelder RE; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 18562740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
