206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16969755)
1. A new chemical etching process to improve endosseous implant osseointegration: in vitro evaluation on human osteoblast-like cells.
Giordano C; Sandrini E; Busini V; Chiesa R; Fumagalli G; Giavaresi G; Fini M; Giardino R; Cigada A
Int J Artif Organs; 2006 Aug; 29(8):772-80. PubMed ID: 16969755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sandblasted-acid-etched titanium surface influences in vitro the biological behavior of SaOS-2 human osteoblast-like cells.
Ramaglia L; Postiglione L; Di Spigna G; Capece G; Salzano S; Rossi G
Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 21422669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of titanium with electrochemical anodization on the response of the adherent osteoblast-like cell.
Lin YH; Peng PW; Ou KL
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 22811017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.
Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study.
Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.
Zhao B; van der Mei HC; Rustema-Abbing M; Busscher HJ; Ren Y
Int J Oral Sci; 2015 Dec; 7(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 26674427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
Singh RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces.
Galli C; Guizzardi S; Passeri G; Martini D; Tinti A; Mauro G; Macaluso GM
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 15857069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell behavior related to implant surfaces with different microstructure and chemical composition: an in vitro analysis.
Conserva E; Lanuti A; Menini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1099-107. PubMed ID: 21197485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation.
Klein MO; Bijelic A; Ziebart T; Koch F; Kämmerer PW; Wieland M; Konerding MA; Al-Nawas B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 21682843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium nitride oxide coating on rough titanium stimulates the proliferation of human primary osteoblasts.
Durual S; Pernet F; Rieder P; Mekki M; Cattani-Lorente M; Wiskott HW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 21087318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
