These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16969851)

  • 1. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Seppenwoolde Y; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Oct; 68(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 16969851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inaccuracy of quantitative coronary arteriography when analyzed from S-VHS videotape.
    Reiber JH; Koning G; van der Zwet PM; Schiemanck L
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 8770476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: interlaboratory variability.
    Beauman GJ; Reiber JH; Koning G; Vogel RA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 8770475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure during elective coronary angioplasty: the effect of flat-panel detection.
    Prasan AM; Ison G; Rees DM
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Jun; 17(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 18242132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system.
    Van Herck PL; Gavit L; Gorissen P; Wuyts FL; Claeys MJ; Bosmans JM; Benali K; Vrints CJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 15390252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS.
    Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A scanning x-ray imaging system for quantitative arteriography and blood flow measurements.
    Fenster A; Cunningham IA; Hobbs BB
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(4):173-81. PubMed ID: 3762450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
    Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary feasibility study of an in-line phase contrast X-ray imaging prototype.
    Zhang D; Donovan M; Fajardo LL; Archer A; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2249-57. PubMed ID: 18713694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
    Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
    Du LY; Umoh J; Nikolov HN; Pollmann SI; Lee TY; Holdsworth DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.