101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16969983)
1. Assessing the difference between planned and delivered intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose distributions based on radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Papanikotaou N; Svensson R; Kappas C; Lind BK; Brahme A
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2006 Sep; 18(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 16969983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy provides effective dosimetric outcomes for cervical cancer treatment with lower toxicities.
Lv Y; Wang F; Yang L; Sun G
Cancer Radiother; 2014 Dec; 18(8):745-52. PubMed ID: 25451672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional 3D conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of gynecologic malignancies: a comparative dosimetric study of dose-volume histograms.
Heron DE; Gerszten K; Selvaraj RN; King GC; Sonnik D; Gallion H; Comerci J; Edwards RP; Wu A; Andrade RS; Kalnicki S
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 14529660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of daily megavoltage CT registration on adaptive radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy.
Mavroidis P; Su FC; Giantsoudi D; Stathakis S; Komisopoulos G; Shi C; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 10(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21214283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression.
van de Bunt L; van der Heide UA; Ketelaars M; de Kort GA; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 15978745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.
Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application value of reduced field intensity modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer].
DU XL; Sheng XG; Wang C; Yu H; Song QQ; Pan CX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 35(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24506963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in posthysterectomy cervical carcinoma.
D'Souza WD; Ahamad AA; Iyer RB; Salehpour MR; Jhingran A; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1062-70. PubMed ID: 15752885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric verification of biologically adapted IMRT.
Rødal J; Waldeland E; Søvik A; Malinen E
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2586-94. PubMed ID: 21776795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing bowel sparing in intensity modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies.
Georg P; Georg D; Hillbrand M; Kirisits C; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jul; 80(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16766068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix: is what you plan actually what you deliver?
Lim K; Kelly V; Stewart J; Xie J; Cho YB; Moseley J; Brock K; Fyles A; Lundin A; Rehbinder H; Milosevic M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):304-12. PubMed ID: 19362250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A randomized study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three dimensional conformal radiation therapy for pelvic radiation in patients of post-operative treatment with gynecologic malignant tumor].
Ni J; Yin ZM; Yuan SH; Liu NF; Li L; Xu XX; Lou HM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):168-174. PubMed ID: 28355688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
