BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16971795)

  • 21. Molecular imaging with targeted contrast ultrasound.
    Kaufmann BA; Lindner JR
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2007 Feb; 18(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17241779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrasound-mediated vascular gene transfection by cavitation of endothelial-targeted cationic microbubbles.
    Xie A; Belcik T; Qi Y; Morgan TK; Champaneri SA; Taylor S; Davidson BP; Zhao Y; Klibanov AL; Kuliszewski MA; Leong-Poi H; Ammi A; Lindner JR
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 5(12):1253-62. PubMed ID: 23236976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering.
    Needles A; Couture O; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1564-73. PubMed ID: 19632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radial modulation of microbubbles for ultrasound contrast imaging.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; Borsboom J; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2283-90. PubMed ID: 18051162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasound molecular imaging of E-selectin in tumor vessels using poly n-butyl cyanoacrylate microbubbles covalently coupled to a short targeting peptide.
    Fokong S; Fragoso A; Rix A; Curaj A; Wu Z; Lederle W; Iranzo O; Gätjens J; Kiessling F; Palmowski M
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):843-50. PubMed ID: 23857137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced US and magnetic microbubbles targeted to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 for molecular imaging of atherosclerosis.
    Wu J; Leong-Poi H; Bin J; Yang L; Liao Y; Liu Y; Cai J; Xie J; Liu Y
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 21555346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.
    Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Temporal and Spatial Analysis Approach to Automated Segmentation of Microbubble Signals in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images: Application to Quantification of Active Vascular Density in Human Lower Limbs.
    Cheung WK; Williams KJ; Christensen-Jeffries K; Dharmarajah B; Eckersley RJ; Davies AH; Tang MX
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2221-2234. PubMed ID: 28693905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Harmonic vibro-acoustography.
    Chen S; Kinnick RR; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1346-51. PubMed ID: 17718323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Polymeric ultrasound contrast agents targeted to integrins: importance of process methods and surface density of ligands.
    Wheatley MA; Lathia JD; Oum KL
    Biomacromolecules; 2007 Feb; 8(2):516-22. PubMed ID: 17291076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast-enhanced molecular ultrasound differentiates endoglin genotypes in mouse embryos.
    Denbeigh JM; Nixon BA; Lee JJ; Jerkic M; Marsden PA; Letarte M; Puri MC; Foster FS
    Angiogenesis; 2015 Jan; 18(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 25298070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Targeting and ultrasound imaging of microbubble-based contrast agents.
    Klibanov AL; Hughes MS; Villanueva FS; Jankowski RJ; Wagner WR; Wojdyla JK; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
    MAGMA; 1999 Aug; 8(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 10504045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The onset of microbubble vibration.
    Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
    Quaia E
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):604-15. PubMed ID: 20927527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of echo signal from single ultrasound contrast microbubble using a reversible jump MCMC algorithm.
    Yan Y; Hopgood JR; Sboros V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1273-6. PubMed ID: 18002195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of Normalized Singular Spectrum Area as a Classifier for Molecularly Targeted Microbubble Adherence.
    Herbst EB; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Mauldin FW; Hossack JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2493-2501. PubMed ID: 31227262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.
    Chen CC; Sirsi SR; Homma S; Borden MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 22305060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification.
    Rychak JJ; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Mar; 52(3):421-33. PubMed ID: 15857050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3.
    Ellegala DB; Leong-Poi H; Carpenter JE; Klibanov AL; Kaul S; Shaffrey ME; Sklenar J; Lindner JR
    Circulation; 2003 Jul; 108(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12835208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction.
    van Wamel A; Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1255-8. PubMed ID: 15550330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.