These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16971994)

  • 1. Digital radiography.
    Mattoon JS
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2006; 19(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 16971994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the image quality of conventional and digital radiography in lizards. Mammography technique versus digital detector system].
    Bochmann M; Ludewig E; Pees M
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 22143664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition hardware for digital imaging.
    Widmer WR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1 Suppl 1):S2-8. PubMed ID: 18283979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K
    Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State-of-the-art digital radiography.
    Lee KR; Siegel EL; Templeton AW; Dwyer SJ; Murphey MD; Wetzel LH
    Radiographics; 1991 Nov; 11(6):1013-25; discussion 1026. PubMed ID: 1749846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of flat-panel digital to conventional film-screen radiography in detection of experimentally created lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.
    Moorman VJ; Marshall JF; Devine DV; Payton M; Jann HW; Bahr R
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 19999339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.
    Körner M; Weber CH; Wirth S; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser MF; Treitl M
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 17495286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fracture diagnosis with digital luminescence radiography].
    Klein HM; Wein B; Langen HJ; Glaser KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.