These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16972106)

  • 1. Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status.
    Kelly TH; Robbins G; Martin CA; Fillmore MT; Lane SD; Harrington NG; Rush CR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 16972106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine: Dimensions of impulsivity.
    Harvanko A; Martin C; Lile J; Kryscio R; Kelly TH
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2016 Dec; 24(6):436-446. PubMed ID: 27929346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance and subjective effects of diazepam and d-amphetamine in high and low sensation seekers.
    Kelly TH; Delzer TA; Martin CA; Harrington NG; Hays LR; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):505-17. PubMed ID: 19654505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: influence of sensation-seeking status.
    Stoops WW; Lile JA; Robbins CG; Martin CA; Rush CR; Kelly TH
    Addict Behav; 2007 Jun; 32(6):1177-88. PubMed ID: 17011712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers.
    White TL; Lott DC; de Wit H
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2006 May; 31(5):1064-74. PubMed ID: 16237380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate assessment of individual differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as predictors of amphetamine self-administration and prefrontal dopamine function in rats.
    Marusich JA; Darna M; Charnigo RJ; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2011 Aug; 19(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 21574722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of genetic variability in the dopamine receptor D2 in relation to behavioral inhibition and impulsivity/sensation seeking: an exploratory study with d-amphetamine in healthy participants.
    Hamidovic A; Dlugos A; Skol A; Palmer AA; de Wit H
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Dec; 17(6):374-83. PubMed ID: 19968402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans: influence of subclinical levels of inattention and hyperactivity.
    Sevak RJ; Stoops WW; Rush CR
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2010 Jul; 36(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20560842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.
    Holdstock L; de Wit H
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2001 Apr; 25(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 11329494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oxazepam does not modulate the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Lile JA; Stoops WW; Wagner FP; Glaser PE; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2005 Oct; 82(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16182353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality factors moderate subjective and psychophysiological responses to d-amphetamine in humans.
    Hutchison KE; Wood MD; Swift R
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 1999 Nov; 7(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 10609984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploratory examination of the effects of d-amphetamine on active-state functional connectivity: Influence of impulsivity and sensation-seeking status.
    Smith AP; Kelly TH; Lile JA; Martin CA; Ramirez MP; Wesley MJ
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2022 Apr; 30(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 33764102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute physiological and behavioral effects of intranasal methamphetamine in humans.
    Hart CL; Gunderson EW; Perez A; Kirkpatrick MG; Thurmond A; Comer SD; Foltin RW
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Jul; 33(8):1847-55. PubMed ID: 17851535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking.
    White TL; Lejuez CW; de Wit H
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Dec; 15(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 18179313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are attention lapses related to d-amphetamine liking?
    McCloskey M; Palmer AA; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Feb; 208(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 19936714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations between sensation seeking and d-amphetamine reinforcement.
    Miller ME; Badger GJ; Heil SH; Higgins ST; Sigmon SC
    Am J Addict; 2015 Aug; 24(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 25846715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in timing of peak positive subjective responses to d-amphetamine: Relationship to pharmacokinetics and physiology.
    Smith CT; Weafer J; Cowan RL; Kessler RM; Palmer AA; de Wit H; Zald DH
    J Psychopharmacol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):330-43. PubMed ID: 26880226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Riluzole and D-amphetamine interactions in humans.
    Sofuoglu M; Waters AJ; Mooney M; Kosten T
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 32(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex, but not repeated maternal separation during the first postnatal week, influences novel object exploration and amphetamine sensitivity.
    Hensleigh E; Smedley L; Pritchard LM
    Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Mar; 53(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 20886535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inattention, impulsive action, and subjective response to D-amphetamine.
    Weafer J; de Wit H
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Nov; 133(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 23790566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.