These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16972877)

  • 1. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning.
    Rondinini C; Wilson KA; Boitani L; Grantham H; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Oct; 9(10):1136-45. PubMed ID: 16972877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.
    Underwood JG; D'Agrosa C; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 19659686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protection of mammal diversity in Central America.
    Jenkins CN; Giri C
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 18616739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation-area networks.
    Justus J; Fuller T; Sarkar S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 18445075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plant diversity hotspots in the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil.
    Murray-Smith C; Brummitt NA; Oliveira-Filho AT; Bachman S; Moat J; Lughadha EM; Lucas EJ
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 18950472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of community-composition data to predict the fecundity and abundance of species.
    Elmendorf SC; Moore KA
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 18847440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks.
    Grand J; Cummings MP; Rebelo TG; Ricketts TH; Neel MC
    Ecol Lett; 2007 May; 10(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 17498135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.
    Gaston KJ; Jackson SF; Nagy A; Cantú-Salazar L; Johnson M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1134():97-119. PubMed ID: 18566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns.
    Pineda E; Lobo JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 18771504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
    Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna.
    Urbina-Cardona JN; Flores-Villela O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1031-41. PubMed ID: 20345399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity.
    Araújo MB; Lobo JM; Moreno JC
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1423-32. PubMed ID: 18173466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy.
    Maiorano L; Falcucci A; Garton EO; Boitani L
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1433-44. PubMed ID: 18173467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of coarse-resolution models of species' distributions to guide local conservation inferences.
    Barbosa AM; Real R; Vargas JM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1378-87. PubMed ID: 20455912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Household location choices: implications for biodiversity conservation.
    Peterson MN; Chen X; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):912-21. PubMed ID: 18445074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A probabilistic model of reserve design.
    Bascompte J; Luque B; Olarrea J; Lacasa L
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):205-11. PubMed ID: 17418238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogeographic lineages and species comparisons in conservation analyses: a case study of california herpetofauna.
    Rissler LJ; Hijmans RJ; Graham CH; Moritz C; Wake DB
    Am Nat; 2006 May; 167(5):655-66. PubMed ID: 16671010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species.
    Nicholson E; Westphal MI; Frank K; Rochester WA; Pressey RL; Lindenmayer DB; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1049-60. PubMed ID: 16925654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of incremental reserve design and changing reservation goals on the long-term efficiency of reserve systems.
    Stewart RR; Ball IR; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):346-54. PubMed ID: 17391185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transferability of species distribution models: a functional habitat approach for two regionally threatened butterflies.
    Vanreusel W; Maes D; Van Dyck H
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 17298526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.