218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16973180)
1. Abnormally speeded saccades to ipsilesional targets in patients with spatial neglect.
Natale E; Marzi CA; Bricolo E; Johannsen L; Karnath HO
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 16973180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli.
Ptak R; Schnider A
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 15901652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect.
Ptak R; Schnider A; Golay L; Müri R
Brain; 2007 Dec; 130(Pt 12):3211-22. PubMed ID: 17905795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ipsilesional biases in saccades but not perception after lesions of the human inferior parietal lobule.
Ro T; Rorden C; Driver J; Rafal R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 11595095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.
Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
Ptak R; Golay L
Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The imbalance of oculomotor capture in unilateral visual neglect.
Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):186-97. PubMed ID: 20004118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
Snow JC; Mattingley JB
Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are drawing perseverations part of the neglect syndrome?
Pia L; Folegatti A; Guagliardo M; Genero R; Gindri P
Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18708186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral impairment of concurrent saccade programming in hemispatial neglect.
Ptak R; Schnider A; Müri R
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):880-6. PubMed ID: 19914262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect.
Rossit S; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1563-72. PubMed ID: 18771672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect.
Pisella L; Mattingley JB
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2004 Apr; 28(2):181-200. PubMed ID: 15172763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.
Machner B; Dorr M; Sprenger A; von der Gablentz J; Heide W; Barth E; Helmchen C
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2415-25. PubMed ID: 22750122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
Ptak R; Valenza N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect.
Gainotti G; De Luca L; Figliozzi F; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 19231479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
