359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16973253)
1. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
Hasselrot L
Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous glass-ionomer restorations: delayed vs immediate polishing.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18435195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?
Scott JM; Mahoney EK
N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 15328832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost of composite and glass ionomer class II molar restorations and theoretical analyses of cost per year of function at public dental services in Sweden.
Sjögren P
Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 17233326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
