These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16973253)

  • 41. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars.
    Toh SL; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18041507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.
    Manhart J; Chen H; Hamm G; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):481-508. PubMed ID: 15470871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A preliminary study on a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for transitional restorations and subsequent core buildups.
    Plasmans PJ; Kreulen CM; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 11203656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC; Manhart J; Selbertinger A; Paschos E; Kaaden C; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.
    Ersin NK; Aykut A; Candan U; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18435375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Remineralizing effects of glass ionomer restorations on adjacent interproximal caries.
    Jang KT; Garcia-Godoy F; Donly KJ; Segura A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(2):125-8, 142. PubMed ID: 11475688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The theory and practice of internal 'tunnel' restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice.
    Jones SE
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11819878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities.
    Koenraads H; Van der Kroon G; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19211138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.
    Cefaly DF; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Fagundes TC; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18482515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
    Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.