216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16973776)
1. How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on Your 1.5-T system.
Rausch DR; Hendrick RE
Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 16973776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation.
Gokalp G; Topal U; Yildirim N; Tolunay S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.
Kuhl CK; Jost P; Morakkabati N; Zivanovic O; Schild HH; Gieseke J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 16549623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask.
Bitar R; Leung G; Perng R; Tadros S; Moody AR; Sarrazin J; McGregor C; Christakis M; Symons S; Nelson A; Roberts TP
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):513-37. PubMed ID: 16549614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T.
Teifke A; Hlawatsch A; Beier T; Werner Vomweg T; Schadmand S; Schmidt M; Lehr HA; Thelen M
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 12202728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.
Kuhl C
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):356-78. PubMed ID: 17641361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Imaoka I; Wada A; Kaji Y; Hayashi T; Hayashi M; Matsuo M; Sugimura K
Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1431-48. PubMed ID: 16973774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiologic and pathologic findings in breast tumors with high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Bargalló X; Caparrós X; Farrús B; Luis Fernández P
Radiographics; 2010 Mar; 30(2):533-48. PubMed ID: 20228333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
