720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16974018)
1. The case of the misleading funnel plot.
Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Schmid CH; Olkin I
BMJ; 2006 Sep; 333(7568):597-600. PubMed ID: 16974018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
Tang JL; Liu JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Sterne JA; Sutton AJ; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Jones DR; Lau J; Carpenter J; Rücker G; Harbord RM; Schmid CH; Tetzlaff J; Deeks JJ; Peters J; Macaskill P; Schwarzer G; Duval S; Altman DG; Moher D; Higgins JP
BMJ; 2011 Jul; 343():d4002. PubMed ID: 21784880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetry in funnel plot.
Kaneda H
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(2):330-1. PubMed ID: 21712109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
Simmonds M
Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
Egger M; Davey Smith G; Schneider M; Minder C
BMJ; 1997 Sep; 315(7109):629-34. PubMed ID: 9310563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
Lin L
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighted event rates.
Werre SR; Walker-Dilks C
ACP J Club; 2005; 142(3):A10. PubMed ID: 15862055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In the context of performance monitoring, the caterpillar plot should be mothballed in favor of the funnel plot.
Mohammed MA; Deeks JJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jul; 86(1):348; author reply 349. PubMed ID: 18573460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancing evidence-based practice through meta-analysis.
Cowan PA
Nephrol Nurs J; 2004; 31(3):343-4, 347. PubMed ID: 15303433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the funnel plot in detecting publication and related biases in meta-analysis.
Liu JL
Evid Based Dent; 2011 Dec; 12(4):121-2. PubMed ID: 22193659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome.
Panesar SS; Rao C; Vecht JA; Mirza SB; Netuveli G; Morris R; Rosenthal J; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
Can J Surg; 2009 Oct; 52(5):E137-45. PubMed ID: 19865543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues and challenges in coding interventions for meta-analysis of prevention research.
Devine EC
NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():130-46. PubMed ID: 9154255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
