These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Preserving the socket dimensions with bone grafting in single sites: an esthetic surgical approach when planning delayed implant placement. Irinakis T; Tabesh M J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 17674682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration. Hassan KS; Kassim A; Al Ogaly AU Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e8-e15. PubMed ID: 18805718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. Irinakis T J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Dec; 72(10):917-22. PubMed ID: 17187706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review. El Helow K; El Askary Ael S Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 18784536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing of implant placement: planning and procedures for predictable clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Danesh-Meyer M Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2012 Apr; 21():106-8. PubMed ID: 24783843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guided bone regeneration using an allograft material: review and case presentations. Bhola M; Kinaia BM; Chahine K Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 20(9):551-7; quiz 558. PubMed ID: 19113011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esthetic grafting for small volume hard and soft tissue contour defects for implant site development. Le B; Burstein J Implant Dent; 2008 Jun; 17(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18545044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early implant placement following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: biologic rationale and surgical procedures. Buser D; Chen ST; Weber HP; Belser UC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 18990995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Socket grafting: a predictable technique for site preservation. Jackson BJ; Morcos I J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(6):353-64. PubMed ID: 18240796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Techniques for grafting the extraction site in preparation for dental implant placement. Block MS; Jackson WC Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 14(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 16522507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Materials, timing, and techniques: immediate loading in extraction and grafted sites. Interview. Garg AK Dent Implantol Update; 2004 Aug; 15(8):57-64. PubMed ID: 15461231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mineralized bone allograft-plug socket augmentation: rationale and technique. Wang HL; Tsao YP Implant Dent; 2007 Mar; 16(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17356370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The temporal course of mucoperiosteal flap revascularization at guided bone regeneration-treated implant sites: a pilot study. Milstein DM; Mathura KR; Lindeboom JA; Ramsoekh D; Lindeboom R; Ince C J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 36(10):892-7. PubMed ID: 19678859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]