BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16978882)

  • 1. Controlled Support MEG imaging.
    Nagarajan SS; Portniaguine O; Hwang D; Johnson C; Sekihara K
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(3):878-85. PubMed ID: 16978882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian brain source imaging based on combined MEG/EEG and fMRI using MCMC.
    Jun SC; George JS; Kim W; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis S; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1581-94. PubMed ID: 18314351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.
    Friston K; Harrison L; Daunizeau J; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Trujillo-Barreto N; Henson R; Flandin G; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1104-20. PubMed ID: 17997111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.
    Nummenmaa A; Auranen T; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Sams M; Vehtari A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):669-85. PubMed ID: 17300961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources.
    Phillips JW; Leahy RM; Mosher JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Jun; 16(3):338-48. PubMed ID: 9184896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of weighted minimum-norm estimation with Tikhonov regularization for neuromagnetic source imaging].
    Hu J; Hu J; Wang Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 12744189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MEG Connectivity and Power Detections with Minimum Norm Estimates Require Different Regularization Parameters.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():3979547. PubMed ID: 27092179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging.
    Brookes MJ; Gibson AM; Hall SD; Furlong PL; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Singh KD; Holliday IE; Francis ST; Morris PG
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):936-46. PubMed ID: 15528094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Baillet S; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 May; 44(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 9125822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG.
    Wipf DP; Owen JP; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):641-55. PubMed ID: 19596072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
    Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fusion of magnetometer and gradiometer sensors of MEG in the presence of multiplicative error.
    Mohseni HR; Woolrich MW; Kringelbach ML; Luckhoo H; Smith PP; Aziz TZ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 59(7):1951-61. PubMed ID: 22531739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of multi-source minimum variance beamformers for reconstruction of correlated neural activity.
    Moiseev A; Gaspar JM; Schneider JA; Herdman AT
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 21704172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signals.
    Yoshioka T; Toyama K; Kawato M; Yamashita O; Nishina S; Yamagishi N; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1397-413. PubMed ID: 18620066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.