These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16978910)

  • 1. Ocular motor triad with single vision contact lenses compared to spectacle lenses.
    Hunt OA; Wolffsohn JS; García-Resúa C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Dec; 29(5):239-45. PubMed ID: 16978910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Radhakrishnan H; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1309-16. PubMed ID: 21926653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia.
    Langaas T; Riddell PM; Svarverud E; Ystenaes AE; Langeggen I; Bruenech JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18174839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
    Jiménez R; Martínez-Almeida L; Salas C; Ortíz C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 249(6):925-35. PubMed ID: 21104269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disconjugate adaptation to long-standing, large-amplitude, spectacle-corrected anisometropia.
    Oohira A; Zee DS; Guyton DL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Apr; 32(5):1693-703. PubMed ID: 2016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of accommodation and refractive status on the peripheral refractive profile.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 93(9):1186-90. PubMed ID: 19525242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aberration control and vision training as an effective means of improving accommodation in individuals with myopia.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; Rae S; Calver RI; Theagarayan BP; Nelson P; Osuobeni E; Sailoganathan A; Price H; O'Leary DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5120-9. PubMed ID: 19643961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principles and designs of the iseikonic lenses for near vision.
    Wang GJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 83(12):931-6. PubMed ID: 17164675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 19390469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome J; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 18565095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 18201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response.
    Rosenfield M; Carrel MF
    Optometry; 2001 Jan; 72(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11217002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance.
    Chu BS; Wood JM; Collins MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Sep; 51(9):4861-6. PubMed ID: 20375338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association between refractive cutoffs for spectacle provision and visual improvement among school-aged children in South Africa.
    Congdon NG; Patel N; Esteso P; Chikwembani F; Webber F; Msithini RB; Ratcliffe A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17591673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the Cavitron Autorefractor 7 with contact lenses and non contact lens wearing patients.
    Koetting RA; Akerman DH; Koetting RR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 6841865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Differences in the progression of myopic correction in patients with corrective eyeglasses in comparison with correction with contact lenses].
    Mach R; Susický P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1995 Apr; 51(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 8591611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.