These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16978946)

  • 21. Digital imaging of wounds: are measurements reproducible among observers?
    Quan SY; Lazarus GS; Kohli AR; Kapoor R; Margolis DJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 18048869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.
    Laufer S; Cohen ER; Maag AL; Kwan C; Vanveen B; Pugh CM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 196():238-44. PubMed ID: 24732514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An electronic medical record intervention increased nursing home advance directive orders and documentation.
    Lindner SA; Davoren JB; Vollmer A; Williams B; Landefeld CS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Jul; 55(7):1001-6. PubMed ID: 17608871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diabetes and associated risk factors in patients referred for physical therapy in a national primary care electronic medical record database.
    Kirkness CS; Marcus RL; Lastayo PC; Asche CV; Fritz JM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Nov; 88(11):1408-16. PubMed ID: 18801850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The radiologic workup of a palpable breast mass.
    Stein L; Chellman-Jeffers M
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2009 Mar; 76(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 19258464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Documentation for mammographers.
    Hendricks MM
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(5):396M-412M. PubMed ID: 17519376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Positive predictive value of computerized medical records for uncomplicated and complicated upper gastrointestinal ulcer.
    Margulis AV; García Rodríguez LA; Hernández-Díaz S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Oct; 18(10):900-9. PubMed ID: 19623573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardization of wound photography using the Wound Electronic Medical Record.
    Rennert R; Golinko M; Kaplan D; Flattau A; Brem H
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 22(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 19096283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
    Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Achieving competence in clinical breast examination.
    Pennypacker HS; Pilgrim CA
    Nurse Pract Forum; 1993 Jun; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 8513268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Paget's disease of the breast: accuracy of preoperative assessment.
    Zakaria S; Pantvaidya G; Ghosh K; Degnim AC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Apr; 102(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 17028984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations.
    Cooper WO; Hernandez-Diaz S; Gideon P; Dyer SM; Hall K; Dudley J; Cevasco M; Thompson AB; Ray WA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 18081215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast self-examination: defining a cohort still in need.
    Wilke LG; Broadwater G; Rabiner S; Owens E; Yoon S; Ghate S; Scott V; Walsh R; Baker J; Soo MS; Ibarra-Drendall C; Stouder A; Robertson S; Barron A; Seewaldt V
    Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 19800471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy in the recording of pressure ulcers and prevention after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care.
    Gunningberg L; Dahm MF; Ehrenberg A
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Aug; 17(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 18678726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comprehensiveness of family cancer history assessments in primary care.
    Murff HJ; Greevy RA; Syngal S
    Community Genet; 2007; 10(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 17575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Digital patient record for remote monitoring of intraocular pressure, blood pressure and serum glucose].
    Jürgens C; Antal S; Heydenreich F; Sell C; Tost F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Sep; 223(9):757-64. PubMed ID: 16986087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The law of unintended consequences: The Joint Commission regulations and the digital rectal examination.
    Adams BD; McHugh KJ; Bryson SA; Dabulewicz J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):197-201, 201.e1. PubMed ID: 17961818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A methodology to integrate clinical data for the efficient assessment of brain-tumor patients.
    Morioka CA; El-Saden S; Pope W; Sayre J; Duckwiler G; Meng F; Bui A; Kangarloo H
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2008 Mar; 33(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18604762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.