These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16979057)

  • 1. A clinically applicable fracture classification for distal humeral fractures.
    Davies MB; Stanley D
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2006; 15(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 16979057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus.
    Wainwright AM; Williams JR; Carr AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Jul; 82(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 10963156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
    Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value.
    Sjödén GO; Movin T; Güntner P; Aspelin P; Ahrengart L; Ersmark H; Sperber A
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Jun; 68(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9246984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of the Gartland classification for supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
    Heal J; Bould M; Livingstone J; Blewitt N; Blom AW
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2007 Apr; 15(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 17429110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the measurement of displaced humeral medial epicondyle fractures in children.
    Pappas N; Lawrence JT; Donegan D; Ganley T; Flynn JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 20124058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the Anterior Humeral Line Index Compared With the Gartland Classification for Posteriorly Hinged Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.
    Murphy-Zane MS; Pyle L
    Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):e502-e505. PubMed ID: 29708571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a modified Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures.
    Barton KL; Kaminsky CK; Green DW; Shean CJ; Kautz SM; Skaggs DL
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 11176349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Modified Gartland Classification Clarify Decision Making?
    Leung S; Paryavi E; Herman MJ; Sponseller PD; Abzug JM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2018 Jan; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 26974527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.
    Wood KB; Khanna G; Vaccaro AR; Arnold PM; Harris MB; Mehbod AA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1423-9. PubMed ID: 15995107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures.
    Papakonstantinou MK; Hart MJ; Farrugia R; Gabbe BJ; Kamali Moaveni A; van Bavel D; Page RS; Richardson MD
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register.
    Wennergren D; Stjernström S; Möller M; Sundfeldt M; Ekholm C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):251. PubMed ID: 28601085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the Lagrange and Rigault classification system of supracondylar humerus extension fractures in children.
    de Gheldere A; Legname M; Leyder M; Mezzadri G; Docquier PL; Lascombes P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Oct; 96(6):652-5. PubMed ID: 20696629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited.
    Majed A; Macleod I; Bull AM; Zyto K; Resch H; Hertel R; Reilly P; Emery RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Oct; 20(7):1125-32. PubMed ID: 21481611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive classification of proximal humeral fractures: HGLS system.
    Sukthankar AV; Leonello DT; Hertel RW; Ding GS; Sandow MJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jul; 22(7):e1-6. PubMed ID: 23313369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by the Pediatric Expert Group of the AO Foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and the International Association for Pediatric Traumatology.
    Slongo T; Audigé L; Schlickewei W; Clavert JM; Hunter J;
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16439900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic algorithm for a validated displacement grading of pediatric supracondylar fractures.
    Lutz N; Audigé L; Schmittenbecher P; Clavert JM; Frick S; Slongo T
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Mar; 31(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 21307703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New classification system for long-bone fractures supplementing the AO/OTA classification.
    Garnavos C; Kanakaris NK; Lasanianos NG; Tzortzi P; West RM
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e709-19. PubMed ID: 22588414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
    Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.