139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16979060)
1. Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws.
Tingart MJ; Lehtinen J; Zurakowski D; Warner JJ; Apreleva M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2006; 15(5):620-4. PubMed ID: 16979060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head.
Liew AS; Johnson JA; Patterson SD; King GJ; Chess DG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2000; 9(5):423-6. PubMed ID: 11075327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.
Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where do locking screws purchase in the humeral head?
Brianza S; Röderer G; Schiuma D; Schwyn R; Scola A; Gebhard F; Tami AE
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):850-5. PubMed ID: 22088326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of a proximal humeral locking plate using two methods of head fixation.
Schumer RA; Muckley KL; Markert RJ; Prayson MJ; Heflin J; Konstantakos EK; Goswami T
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Jun; 19(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 20189837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of trabecular microstructure and cortical index on the complexity of proximal humeral fractures.
Osterhoff G; Diederichs G; Tami A; Theopold J; Josten C; Hepp P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 22200902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.
Krappinger D; Bizzotto N; Riedmann S; Kammerlander C; Hengg C; Kralinger FS
Injury; 2011 Nov; 42(11):1283-8. PubMed ID: 21310406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biomechanical study on effects of bone mineral density on fixation strength of expansive pedicle screw].
Gao M; Li X; Zhen P; Wu Z; Zhou S; Tian Q; Lei W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):969-73. PubMed ID: 24171353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of bone quality in the proximal humerus by measurement of the contralateral site: a cadaveric analyze.
Diederichs G; Korner J; Goldhahn J; Linke B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Mar; 126(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 16456662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screw placement in two different implants for proximal humeral fractures regarding regional differences in bone mineral density: An anatomical study.
Holweg P; Dauwe J; Grechenig P; Holter M; Staresinic M; Feigl G; Bakota B
Injury; 2021 Sep; 52 Suppl 5():S17-S21. PubMed ID: 33069397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone.
Osterhoff G; Baumgartner D; Favre P; Wanner GA; Gerber H; Simmen HP; Werner CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jul; 20(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 21330155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of cortical thickness of the proximal humerus and pullout strength of a locked plate and screw construct.
Wallace MJ; Bledsoe G; Moed BR; Israel HA; Kaar SG
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Apr; 26(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 22207205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.
Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to Use Fluoroscopic Imaging to Prevent Intraarticular Screw Perforation During Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.
Lowe JB; Monazzam S; Walton B; Nelson E; Wolinsky PR
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Oct; 29(10):e401-7. PubMed ID: 26131567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The position and number of screws influence screw perforation of the humeral head in modern locking plates: a cadaver study.
Erhardt JB; Stoffel K; Kampshoff J; Badur N; Yates P; Kuster MS
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Oct; 26(10):e188-92. PubMed ID: 22357093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical measurements of cortical screw purchase in five types of human and artificial humeri.
Aziz MS; Nicayenzi B; Crookshank MC; Bougherara H; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():159-67. PubMed ID: 24295967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional characterization of trabecular bone mineral density of the proximal ulna using quantitative computed tomography.
Gil JA; DaSilva K; Johnson E; DaSilva MF; Pidgeon TS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Apr; 29(4):755-760. PubMed ID: 31911213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in metaphyseal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus.
Vaughn DP; Syrcle JA; Ball JE; Elder SH; Gambino JM; Griffin RL; McLaughlin RM
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):466-474. PubMed ID: 27709222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is central skeleton bone quality a predictor of the severity of proximal humeral fractures?
Lee SY; Kwon SS; Kim TH; Shin SJ
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2777-2782. PubMed ID: 27802889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
