These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16979285)

  • 1. Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees.
    Nixon H; Saphores JD
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 16979285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Household demand for waste recycling services.
    Palatnik R; Ayalon O; Shechter M
    Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 35(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 15902451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of unit-based pricing of waste in the Netherlands: applying a general equilibrium model.
    van Beukering PJ; Bartelings H; Linderhof VG; Oosterhuis FH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Nov; 29(11):2892-901. PubMed ID: 19679460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How much e-waste is there in US basements and attics? Results from a national survey.
    Saphores JD; Nixon H; Ogunseitan OA; Shapiro AA
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3322-31. PubMed ID: 19500898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From traditional to modern fee systems.
    Bilitewski B
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2760-6. PubMed ID: 18829291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Residents' behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau.
    Song Q; Wang Z; Li J
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Sep; 106():8-16. PubMed ID: 22562006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach.
    Karousakis K; Birol E
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1099-108. PubMed ID: 17658678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of recycling loops in food waste management in Japan: based on the environmental and economic evaluation of food recycling.
    Takata M; Fukushima K; Kino-Kimata N; Nagao N; Niwa C; Toda T
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 432():309-17. PubMed ID: 22750176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    Afroz R; Masud MM
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):800-8. PubMed ID: 21169007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic waste (e-waste): material flows and management practices in Nigeria.
    Nnorom IC; Osibanjo O
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 17888645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of investments in recycling centres for construction and demolition wastes in Brazilian municipalities.
    Nunes KR; Mahler CF; Valle R; Neves C
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(11):1531-40. PubMed ID: 17125986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration - learning from the Swiss experience.
    Khetriwal DS; Kraeuchi P; Widmer R
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 18162284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait.
    Kartam N; Al-Mutairi N; Al-Ghusain I; Al-Humoud J
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(10):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15567670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of households' willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Rahji MA; Oloruntoba EO
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Dec; 27(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 19470546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. E-waste bans and U.S. households' preferences for disposing of their e-waste.
    Milovantseva N; Saphores JD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():8-16. PubMed ID: 23603771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of future outflows and infrastructure needed to recycle personal computer systems in California.
    Kang HY; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Sep; 137(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16704906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic and policy instrument analyses in support of the scrap tire recycling program in Taiwan.
    Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Feb; 86(3):435-50. PubMed ID: 17276578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Charging systems for municipal solid waste: experience from the Czech Republic.
    Sauer P; Parízková L; Hadrabová A
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2772-7. PubMed ID: 18804364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens.
    Chung SS; Poon CS
    J Environ Manage; 2001 May; 62(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 11400463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.