423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16979502)
1. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations.
Chan HJ; Woods M; Stella D
Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17679537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of craniofacial measurements: computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography compared with stereolithographic models.
Frühwald J; Schicho KA; Figl M; Benesch T; Watzinger F; Kainberger F
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18216660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Sukovic P
J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 72(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16480609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the 3D-cephalogram: a technical note.
Kamiishi H; Miyasato Y; Kosaka M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):258-60. PubMed ID: 17601743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography: strengths, weaknesses, and controversies.
Geist JR
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2011 Mar; 93(3):48-62. PubMed ID: 21526729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a simple method for measuring cranial deformities (plagiocephalometry).
van Adrichem LN; van Vlimmeren LA; Cadanová D; Helders PJ; Engelbert RH; van Neck HJ; Koning AH
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 18216659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.
Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schwarz U; Teschner M; Hammer B; Schmelzeisen R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 18230371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 16286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method for x-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup.
Rinkel J; Gerfault L; Estève F; Dinten JM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4633-52. PubMed ID: 17634655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
Ghanai S; Marmulla R; Wiechnik J; Mühling J; Kotrikova B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.
Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 15877045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method.
Hajeer MY; Ayoub AF; Millett DT; Bock M; Siebert JP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 12593004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Completing the 3-dimensional picture.
Lane C; Harrell W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 18405826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of a parallel-beam CCD optical-CT apparatus for 3D radiation dosimetry.
Krstajić N; Doran SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3693-713. PubMed ID: 17664571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.
Cevidanes LH; Styner MA; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):611-8. PubMed ID: 16679201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
