These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16979723)

  • 1. Removal of more lymph nodes may provide better outcome, as well as more accurate pathologic findings, in patients with bladder cancer--analysis of role of pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Honma I; Masumori N; Sato E; Maeda T; Hirobe M; Kitamura H; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Tamakawa M; Tsukamoto T
    Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 16979723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
    Steven K; Poulsen AL
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Mills RD; Turner WH; Fleischmann A; Markwalder R; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11435814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
    Stein JP
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in lymph node-negative patients with invasive bladder cancer.
    Shirotake S; Kikuchi E; Matsumoto K; Yazawa S; Kosaka T; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Oya M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 40(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 19887521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base.
    Konety BR; Joslyn SA; O'Donnell MA
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):946-50. PubMed ID: 12576819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Skinner DG
    Urol Clin North Am; 2005 May; 32(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15862616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome after radical cystectomy with limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Dhar NB; Klein EA; Reuther AM; Thalmann GN; Madersbacher S; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):873-8; discussion 878. PubMed ID: 18221953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Heidenreich A; Ohlmann CH; Polyakov S
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 17448592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stage specific lymph node metastasis mapping in radical cystectomy specimens.
    Vazina A; Dugi D; Shariat SF; Evans J; Link R; Lerner SP
    J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1830-4. PubMed ID: 15076287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prognosis after radical cystectomy].
    Leissner J; Allhoff EP; Hohenfellner R; Wolf HK
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Apr; 127(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12085284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer.
    Herr HW
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):943-5. PubMed ID: 12576818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the therapy of prostate and bladder cancer].
    Heidenreich A; Ohlmann CH
    Aktuelle Urol; 2005 Jun; 36(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the relevance of lymph node density in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Kassouf W; Leibovici D; Munsell MF; Dinney CP; Grossman HB; Kamat AM
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):53-7; discussion 57. PubMed ID: 16753366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic impact of pelvic lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion on bladder cancer.
    Herrmann E; Stöter E; van Ophoven A; Bierer S; Bolenz C; Hertle L; Wülfing C
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):607-11. PubMed ID: 18462352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of frozen section examination of external iliac, hypogastric, and obturator lymph nodes during radical cystectomy: a multicenter study.
    Adsan O; Baltaci S; Cal C; Büyükalpelli R; Uğurlu O; Bozlu M; Türkölmez K; Sahin H; Elhan A
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 17270622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A thorough pelvic lymph node dissection in presence of positive margins associated with better clinical outcomes in radical cystectomy patients.
    Canter D; Guzzo TJ; Resnick MJ; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Tomaszewski J; VanArsdalen K; Malkowicz SB
    Urology; 2009 Jul; 74(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 19371932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.