These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16980141)

  • 1. Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Zintzaras E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1023-32. PubMed ID: 16980141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: association with reported prognostic effect.
    Kyzas PA; Denaxa-Kyza D; Ioannidis JP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 17284718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Bjørkestøl K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 20528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How should we use information about HWE in the meta-analyses of genetic association studies?
    Minelli C; Thompson JR; Abrams KR; Thakkinstian A; Attia J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 37(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18037675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test homogeneity of odds ratio in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):916-32. PubMed ID: 20183452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods.
    Vandermeer B; Bialy L; Hooton N; Hartling L; Klassen TP; Johnston BC; Wiebe N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Aug; 18(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 18562399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
    McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
    Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 15878467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
    Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.