145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16980256)
1. The validity of the repeatable battery of neuropsychological status in acute stroke.
Wilde MC
Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):702-15. PubMed ID: 16980256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lesion location and repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status performance in acute ischemic stroke.
Wilde MC
Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 19557656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct and predictive validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in the evaluation of stroke patients.
Larson E; Kirschner K; Bode R; Heinemann A; Goodman R
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jan; 27(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 15814440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construct validity of the Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) with acquired brain injury patients.
Pachet AK
Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Mar; 21(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 17455019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity.
Randolph C; Tierney MC; Mohr E; Chase TN
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Jun; 20(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 9845158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.
Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Component structure of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in dementia.
Garcia C; Leahy B; Corradi K; Forchetti C
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 17919882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Discriminatory validity and association of the mini-mental test (MMSE) and the memory alteration test (M@T) with a neuropsychological battery in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease].
Rami L; Bosch B; Valls-Pedret C; Caprile C; Sánchez-Valle Díaz R; Molinuevo JL
Rev Neurol; 2009 Aug 16-31; 49(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19621317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The Japanese version of RBANS (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status)].
Yamashima T; Yoshida M; Kumahashi K; Matsui M; Koshino Y; Higashima M; Nagasawa T; Ueki A; Ohtsuka M; Aoki S; Imuro S; Mori N; Takei N; Hoshino R; Minabe Y; Nanba Y; Nanba M; Kira J; Ohyagi Y; Haraoka J; Akimoto J; Miura N; Kimura S; Matsushita M
No To Shinkei; 2002 Jun; 54(6):463-71. PubMed ID: 12166095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing for neglect in right-hemispheric stroke patients using a new assessment battery based upon standardized activities of daily living (ADL).
Eschenbeck P; Vossel S; Weiss PH; Saliger J; Karbe H; Fink GR
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3488-96. PubMed ID: 20678507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): clinical utility in a traumatic brain injury sample.
McKay C; Wertheimer JC; Fichtenberg NL; Casey JE
Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 22(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 17853143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speed of information processing after unilateral stroke.
Gerritsen MJ; Berg IJ; Deelman BG; Visser-Keizer AC; Meyboom-de Jong B
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12607167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive impairments in patients with hemispatial neglect from acute right hemisphere stroke.
Lee BH; Kim EJ; Ku BD; Choi KM; Seo SW; Kim GM; Chung CS; Heilman KM; Na DL
Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Jun; 21(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 18541981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of the Rey Visual Design Learning Test in primary and secondary school children.
Wilhelm P; Van Klink M
Child Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 13(1):86-98. PubMed ID: 17364565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factor analysis of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.
Carlozzi NE; Horner MD; Yang C; Tilley BC
Appl Neuropsychol; 2008; 15(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 19023744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of perseverative responses in subacute stroke.
Nys GM; van Zandvoort MJ; van der Worp HB; Kappelle LJ; de Haan EH
Brain; 2006 Aug; 129(Pt 8):2148-57. PubMed ID: 16870885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory test.
Fuchs KL; Hannay HJ; Huckeba WM; Espy KA
Clin Neuropsychol; 1999 Feb; 13(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 10937648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests.
Larrabee GJ; Curtiss G
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 7593474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A neuropsychological test battery for use in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.
Harrison J; Minassian SL; Jenkins L; Black RS; Koller M; Grundman M
Arch Neurol; 2007 Sep; 64(9):1323-9. PubMed ID: 17846273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
