622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16981177)
1. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation.
Coad DS; Ivanova A
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 15706635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential urn designs with elimination for comparing K > or =3 treatments.
Coad DS; Ivanova A
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):1995-2009. PubMed ID: 15803441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
Morgan CC
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Covariate-adjusted adaptive designs for continuous responses in a phase III clinical trial: recommendation for practice.
Biswas A; Huang HH; Huang WT
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):227-39. PubMed ID: 16584069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Issues in designing flexible trials.
Posch M; Bauer P; Brannath W
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):953-69. PubMed ID: 12627412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs.
Emerson SS
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3270-96; discussion 3302-4, 3320-5, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16906553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A group sequential adaptive treatment assignment design for proof of concept and dose selection in headache trials.
Hall DB; Meier U; Diener HC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Jun; 26(3):349-64. PubMed ID: 15911469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An urn model for odds-ratio-based response-adaptive phase III clinical trials for two or more treatments.
Basak GK; Biswas A; Volkov S
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):838-56. PubMed ID: 20183447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustness of an odds-ratio test in a stratified group sequential trial with a binary outcome measure.
Srivastava DK; Rai SN; Pan J
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):351-64. PubMed ID: 17623341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.
Anderson KM
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 17623339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Block response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
Magirr D
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22328326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive designs: looking for a needle in the haystack-a new challenge in medical research.
Bauer P
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1565-80. PubMed ID: 17935261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive, group sequential and decision theoretic approaches to sample size determination.
Mehta CR; Patel NR
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3250-69; discussion 3297-301, 3302-4, 3313-4, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16927402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
Feng W; Wahed AS
Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
Desseaux K; Porcher R
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
