These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16981193)

  • 1. Expected value of information and decision making in HTA.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 16981193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The option value of delay in health technology assessment.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 18480035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment in the cost-disutility plane.
    Eckermann S; Briggs A; Willan AR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 18356312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time and expected value of sample information wait for no patient.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Value Health; 2008; 11(3):522-6. PubMed ID: 18179665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--caveats quantified.
    Jakubczyk M; Kamiński B
    Health Econ; 2010 Aug; 19(8):955-63. PubMed ID: 19688780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Globally optimal trial design for local decision making.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Health Econ; 2009 Feb; 18(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18435429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying key parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis using value of information: a comparison of methods.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Myriam Hunink MG; Stijnen T; Weinstein MC
    Health Econ; 2006 Apr; 15(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complementing the net benefit approach: a new framework for Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hernández MA; Vázquez-Polo FJ; González-Torre FJ; Bas EM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 19845984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of information and optimal clinical trial design.
    Willan AR; Pinto EM
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1791-806. PubMed ID: 15806619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Hunink MG; Stijnen T; Hammitt JK; Kuntz KM; Weinstein MC
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 17409361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical decision making and the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 17715257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An economic approach to clinical trial design and research priority-setting.
    Claxton K; Posnett J
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(6):513-24. PubMed ID: 9003938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Probabilistic uncertainty analysis and stochastic league tables.
    Baltussen RM; Hutubessy RC; Evans DB; Murray CJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 11987434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A forensic evaluation of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial using the expected value of information approach.
    Ramsey SD; Blough DK; Sullivan SD
    Med Care; 2008 May; 46(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 18438203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the silence of the lambda.
    Gafni A; Birch S
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 May; 62(9):2091-100. PubMed ID: 16325975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
    Willan A; Kowgier M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany.
    von der Schulenburg J; Vauth C; Mittendorf T; Greiner W
    Eur J Health Econ; 2007 Sep; 8 Suppl 1():S5-31. PubMed ID: 17582539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.