178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16981791)
1. Dynamic IMRT treatments of sinus region tumors: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with treatment planning system calculations and ion chamber measurements.
Court LE; Jahnke L; Chin D; Song J; Cormack R; Zygmanski P; Tishler RB; Chin L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 5(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 16981791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac.
Gete E; Duzenli C; Milette MP; Mestrovic A; Hyde D; Bergman AM; Teke T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021707. PubMed ID: 23387730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo evaluation of a treatment planning system for helical tomotherapy in an anthropomorphic heterogeneous phantom and for clinical treatment plans.
Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5366-74. PubMed ID: 19175096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the dose calculation accuracy in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for mesothelioma, focusing on low doses to the contralateral lung.
Court LE; Ching D; Schofield D; Czerminska M; Allen AM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 10(2):34-42. PubMed ID: 19458589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulations to replace film dosimetry in IMRT verification.
Goetzfried T; Rickhey M; Treutwein M; Koelbl O; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20888202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of the out-of-field dose calculations using a model based algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Ding GX
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):N113-28. PubMed ID: 24925858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MLC parameters from static fields to VMAT plans: an evaluation in a RT-dedicated MC environment (PRIMO).
Paganini L; Reggiori G; Stravato A; Palumbo V; Mancosu P; Lobefalo F; Gaudino A; Fogliata A; Scorsetti M; Tomatis S
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):216. PubMed ID: 31791355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Secondary monitor unit calculations for VMAT using parallelized Monte Carlo simulations.
Bhagroo S; French SB; Mathews JA; Nazareth DP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):60-69. PubMed ID: 31127699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets.
Capote R; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2416-22. PubMed ID: 15487721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo implementation, validation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC.
Fix MK; Volken W; Frei D; Frauchiger D; Born EJ; Manser P
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5311-20. PubMed ID: 21992349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
