These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16982087)

  • 1. Fracture toughness comparison of three test methods with four dental porcelains.
    Wang H; Pallav P; Isgrò G; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 16982087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture toughness determination of two dental porcelains with the indentation strength in bending method.
    Wang H; Isgrò G; Pallav P; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 16890984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites.
    Fujishima A; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8598249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of artificial saliva storage on microhardness and fracture toughness of a hydrothermal glass-ceramic.
    Fahmy NZ; El Guindy J; Zamzam M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 19486457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of multiple firing on thermal contraction of ceramic materials used for the fabrication of layered all-ceramic dental restorations.
    Isgrò G; Kleverlaan CJ; Wang H; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 15904699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics.
    Yilmaz H; Aydin C; Gul BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 17692593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between fracture toughness and leucite content in dental porcelains.
    Cesar PF; Yoshimura HN; Miranda Júnior WG; Okada CY
    J Dent; 2005 Oct; 33(9):721-9. PubMed ID: 16199280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Determination and Weibull analysis of the strength of dental veneering porcelains].
    Teng JL; Luo L; He LH; Wang H; Chao YL
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Jan; 39(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 18390222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three fracture toughness testing techniques using a dental glass and a dental ceramic.
    Scherrer SS; Denry IL; Wiskott HW
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):246-55. PubMed ID: 10379252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of ion exchange on hardness and fracture toughness of dental ceramics.
    Seghi RR; Denry I; Brajevic F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 1520452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elastic constants, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness of fluorrichterite-based glass-ceramics.
    Denry IL; Holloway JA
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15209226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture surface examination of dental ceramics using fractal analysis.
    Drummond JL; Thompson M; Super BJ
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 15904703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexural and shear strengths of ZrO2 and a high-noble alloy bonded to their corresponding porcelains.
    Ashkanani HM; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Heindl H; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 18922256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of three testing methods of fracture toughness using indirect composite].
    Akiike S; Nose H; Hirota Y; Tawada Y; Komatsu S
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 52(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 18292646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis.
    Scherrer SS; Kelly JR; Quinn GD; Xu K
    Dent Mater; 1999 Sep; 15(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 10863431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture toughness of a ceramic-resin interface.
    Moharamzadeh K; Hooshmand T; Keshvad A; Van Noort R
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 17560643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.
    Plengsombut K; Brewer JD; Monaco EA; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 19231568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials.
    Rizkalla AS; Jones DW
    Dent Mater; 2004 Feb; 20(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 14706804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.