These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16983516)

  • 1. Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.
    Dahl E; Beutel M; Brosig B; Grüssner S; Stöbel-Richter Y; Tinneberg HR; Brähler E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2006; 23(7-8):311-8. PubMed ID: 16983516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preconception sex selection demand and preferences in the United States.
    Dahl E; Gupta RS; Beutel M; Stoebel-Richter Y; Brosig B; Tinneberg HR; Jain T
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):468-73. PubMed ID: 16595229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany.
    Dahl E; Beutel M; Brosig B; Hinsch KD
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2231-4. PubMed ID: 14507848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan.
    Zubair F; Dahl E; Sher Shah S; Ahmed M; Brosig B
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 17062579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preconception gender selection: a threat to the natural sex ratio?
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():116-8. PubMed ID: 15820021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes towards preconception sex selection: a representative survey from Germany.
    Dahl E; Hinsch KD; Brosig B; Beutel M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Dec; 9(6):600-3. PubMed ID: 15670402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 14656397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review.
    Hall S; Reid E; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):619-26. PubMed ID: 16856225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan.
    Ahmad Al-Akour N; Khassawneh M; Khader Y; Dahl E
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1665-9. PubMed ID: 19359337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preconception sex selection: a survey of visitors to an internet-based health forum.
    Himmel W; Dahl E; Michelmann H
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16 Suppl 1():18-26. PubMed ID: 18348786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.
    Browne TK
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 28299587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex selection: laissez faire or family balancing?
    Dahl E
    Health Care Anal; 2005 Mar; 13(1):87-90; discussion 91-3. PubMed ID: 15889684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social aspects of > 800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children.
    Liu P; Rose GA
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Apr; 10(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7650153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex selection for social reasons--a dilemma.
    Banerjee S
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2005 Oct; 103(10):557. PubMed ID: 16498767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distortions of sex ratios at birth in the United States; evidence for prenatal gender selection.
    Egan JF; Campbell WA; Chapman A; Shamshirsaz AA; Gurram P; Benn PA
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 21442626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contraceptive use in Matlab, Bangladesh: the role of gender preference.
    Rahman M; Akbar J; Phillips JF; Becker S
    Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 1412596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upsetting the balance on sex selection.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1022-1028. PubMed ID: 31309598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preferences for the sex-composition of children in Europe: a multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child.
    Mills M; Begall K
    Popul Stud (Camb); 2010 Mar; 64(1):77-95. PubMed ID: 20391202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting past nature as a guide to the human sex ratio.
    Murphy TF
    Bioethics; 2013 May; 27(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 22150752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.
    Hendl T
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Sep; 14(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 28815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.