269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16984054)
1. Searching for and use of conference abstracts in health technology assessments: policy and practice.
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Williamson P; Walley T; Dickson R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16984054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case study of the comparison of data from conference abstracts and full-text articles in health technology assessment of rapidly evolving technologies: does it make a difference?
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Williamson P; Dickson R; Walley T
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 16984055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of abstracts from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand in Cochrane reviews.
Hopewell S
Respirology; 2003 Dec; 8(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 14629657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches.
Scherer RW; Saldanha IJ
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):264. PubMed ID: 31699124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported?
Duan Y; Li J; Ai C; Chen Y; Chen P; Zhang M; Hopewell S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 19845978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews.
Nixon J; Duffy S; Armstrong N; Craig D; Glanville J; Christie J; Drummond M; Kleijnen J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 15446753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agencies.
Pieper D; Antoine SL; Morfeld JC; Mathes T; Eikermann M
Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 26052845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.
Scherer RW; Langenberg P; von Elm E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000005. PubMed ID: 17443628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population-based biomedical sexually transmitted infection control interventions for reducing HIV infection.
Ng BE; Butler LM; Horvath T; Rutherford GW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Mar; (3):CD001220. PubMed ID: 21412869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conference abstracts and full-text publications of randomized controlled trials presented at four consecutive World Congresses of Pain: Reporting quality and agreement of results.
Saric L; Vucic K; Dragicevic K; Vrdoljak M; Jakus D; Vuka I; Jelicic Kadic A; Saldanha IJ; Puljak L
Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 29987884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the international use of health technology assessments: exploring the merits of different methods when applied to the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme.
Wright D; Milne R; Price A; Tose N
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 23552058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis.
Lensen S; Jordan V; Showell M; Showell E; Shen V; Venetis C; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1658-1666. PubMed ID: 28854591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ImmunoCAP® ISAC and Microtest for multiplex allergen testing in people with difficult to manage allergic disease: a systematic review and cost analysis.
Westwood M; Ramaekers B; Lang S; Armstrong N; Noake C; de Kock S; Joore M; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(67):1-178. PubMed ID: 27623692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How health technology assessment agencies address the issue of unpublished data.
Kreis J; Panteli D; Busse R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24622603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.
Andronis L; Barton P; Bryan S
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. PubMed ID: 19500484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
Briscoe S
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What value health?: A review of health state values used in early technology assessments for NICE.
Stein K; Fry A; Round A; Milne R; Brazier J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 16466273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
