BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16984055)

  • 1. Case study of the comparison of data from conference abstracts and full-text articles in health technology assessment of rapidly evolving technologies: does it make a difference?
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Williamson P; Dickson R; Walley T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 16984055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for and use of conference abstracts in health technology assessments: policy and practice.
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Williamson P; Walley T; Dickson R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16984054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers.
    Yoon U; Knobloch K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():47. PubMed ID: 22494412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conference abstracts and full-text publications of randomized controlled trials presented at four consecutive World Congresses of Pain: Reporting quality and agreement of results.
    Saric L; Vucic K; Dragicevic K; Vrdoljak M; Jakus D; Vuka I; Jelicic Kadic A; Saldanha IJ; Puljak L
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 29987884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported?
    Duan Y; Li J; Ai C; Chen Y; Chen P; Zhang M; Hopewell S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 19845978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis.
    Lensen S; Jordan V; Showell M; Showell E; Shen V; Venetis C; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1658-1666. PubMed ID: 28854591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.
    Scherer RW; Langenberg P; von Elm E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000005. PubMed ID: 17443628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences.
    Hopewell S; Boutron I; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1488-95. PubMed ID: 25890806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study.
    Scherer RW; Huynh L; Ervin AM; Taylor J; Dickersin K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():79. PubMed ID: 23773868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency of phase III clinical trial abstracts presented at an annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology compared with their subsequent full-text publications.
    Tam VC; Hotte SJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2205-11. PubMed ID: 18445846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodologists and their methods. Do methodologists write up their conference presentations or is it just 15 minutes of fame?
    Hopewell S; Clarke M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):601-3. PubMed ID: 11758303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting quality and information consistency of randomized, controlled trials presented as abstracts at the American Urological Association annual meetings.
    Turpen RM; Fesperman SF; Smith WA; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):249-53. PubMed ID: 20483151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts.
    Kleweno CP; Bryant WK; Jacir AM; Levine WN; Ahmad CS
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):1875-9. PubMed ID: 18667625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research.
    Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N; Bantoto B; Luo C; Shams I; Shahid H; Chang Y; Sun G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Levine MAH; Adachi JD; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):181. PubMed ID: 29287585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Observational Study of Abstracts Presented at the American College of Veterinary Surgeon Annual Meetings (2001-2008) and Their Subsequent Full-Text Publication.
    Meyers KE; Lindem MJ; Giuffrida MA
    Vet Surg; 2016 Jul; 45(5):672-8. PubMed ID: 27195763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Fate of Abstracts Presented at the 2013 and 2014 Annual Meetings of the Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
    Trifan A; Chihaia CA; Tanase O; Lungu CM; Stanciu C
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2016 Dec; 25(4):533-536. PubMed ID: 27981310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.