287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16984300)
1. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
Adelman JS; Brown GD
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
Perea M; Soares AP; Comesaña M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
Lacruz I; Folk J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lexical access of function versus content words.
Segalowitz SJ; Lane KC
Brain Lang; 2000 Dec; 75(3):376-89. PubMed ID: 11112292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.
Brysbaert M; New B
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 19897807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
Wile TL; Borowsky R
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
Murray WS; Forster KI
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision.
Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Grabbe J; Murphy MD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 16131244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese.
Soares AP; Machado J; Costa A; Iriarte Á; Simões A; de Almeida JJ; Comesaña M; Perea M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):680-96. PubMed ID: 25263599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
Estes Z; Adelman JS
Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
