These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16984310)
21. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations. Chiba Y Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multistate mark-recapture model selection using score tests. McCrea RS; Morgan BJ Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):234-41. PubMed ID: 20486927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):786-94. PubMed ID: 14969456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An extension of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for continuous covariates with application to Microtus pennsylvanicus. Bonner SJ; Schwarz CJ Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 16542240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pooled population parameter from mark-recapture data. Hargrove JW; Borland CH Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1129-41. PubMed ID: 7786993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Bayesian, combinatorial approach to capture-recapture. GarcĂa-Pelayo R Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 16904143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Parameter redundancy in Jolly-Seber tag loss models. Cai W; Yurchak S; Cole DJ; Cowen LLE Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1131-1149. PubMed ID: 33598119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Smoothing population size estimates for time-stratified mark-recapture experiments using Bayesian P-splines. Bonner SJ; Schwarz CJ Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1498-507. PubMed ID: 21504420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Models for estimating abundance from repeated counts of an open metapopulation. Dail D; Madsen L Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):577-87. PubMed ID: 20662829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intercalibration of hydroacoustic and mark-recapture methods for assessing the spawning population size of a threatened fish species. Rakowitz G; Kubecka J; Fesl C; Keckeis H J Fish Biol; 2009 Oct; 75(6):1356-70. PubMed ID: 20738619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data. Saha KK; Paul SR Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Capture-recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity. Thandrayen J; Wang Y Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 20669247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modeling individual effects in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model: a state-space formulation. Royle JA Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17725811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measurement error in a random walk model with applications to population dynamics. Staudenmayer J; Buonaccorsi JP Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1178-89. PubMed ID: 17156293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Semiparametric estimation of tag loss and reporting rates for tag-recovery experiments using exact time-at-liberty data. Cadigan NG; Brattey J Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 14969465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breeding return times and abundance in capture-recapture models. Pledger S; Baker E; Scribner K Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):991-1001. PubMed ID: 24152120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture. Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]