These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16984321)
1. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies. Baker R; Jackson D Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis. Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias. Formann AK Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis. Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Vevea JL; Woods CM Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):428-43. PubMed ID: 16392998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry. Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies. Gleser LJ; Olkin I Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2493-507. PubMed ID: 8961459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of the contents of complementary and alternative medicine journals. Coelho HF; Pittler MH; Ernst E Altern Ther Health Med; 2007; 13(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 17658121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis. Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter. Jackson D Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses. Vaitkus PT; Brar C Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]