171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16985142)
1. Hysterosalpingography for assessing efficacy of Essure microinsert permanent birth control device.
Wittmer MH; Famuyide AO; Creedon DJ; Hartman RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):955-8. PubMed ID: 16985142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy after microinsert sterilization with tubal occlusion confirmed by hysterosalpingogram.
Ory EM; Hines RS; Cleland WH; Rehberg JF
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 2):508-10. PubMed ID: 18239002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonography, CT, and MRI appearance of the Essure microinsert permanent birth control device.
Wittmer MH; Brown DL; Hartman RP; Famuyide AO; Kawashima A; King BF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):959-64. PubMed ID: 16985143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Necessity of hysterosalpingography after Essure microinsert placement for contraception.
Lazarus E; Lourenco AP; Casper S; Allen RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1460-3. PubMed ID: 22623563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population.
Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Kmak DC; Berman JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 18588851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodality imaging of the Essure tubal occlusion device.
Simpson WL; Beitia L
Clin Radiol; 2012 Dec; 67(12):e112-7. PubMed ID: 22985750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
Dreyer K; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast infusion sonography in the post-Essure setting.
Connor V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18262145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging of mechanical tubal occlusion devices and potential complications.
Guelfguat M; Gruenberg TR; Dipoce J; Hochsztein JG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1659-73. PubMed ID: 23065163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
Connor VF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
