These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16985287)

  • 41. Study of the performance of a novel 1 mm resolution dual-panel PET camera design dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Zhang J; Olcott PD; Chinn G; Foudray AM; Levine CS
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):689-702. PubMed ID: 17388187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
    Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differential effect of 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquisition orbits on the accuracy of SPECT imaging: quantitative evaluation in phantoms.
    Liu YH; Lam PT; Sinusas AJ; Wackers FJ
    J Nucl Med; 2002 Aug; 43(8):1115-24. PubMed ID: 12163639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hyperfast parallel-beam and cone-beam backprojection using the cell general purpose hardware.
    Kachelriess M; Knaup M; Bockenbach O
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1474-86. PubMed ID: 17500478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stereotactic mammography imaging combined with 3D US imaging for image guided breast biopsy.
    Surry KJ; Mills GR; Bevan K; Downey DB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4348-58. PubMed ID: 18072500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Partial volume compensated reconstruction of three-dimensional mass shapes in mammographic images.
    Shao L
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17505871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of three types of reference image data for external beam radiotherapy target localization using digital tomosynthesis (DTS).
    Godfrey DJ; Ren L; Yan H; Wu Q; Yoo S; Oldham M; Yin FF
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3374-84. PubMed ID: 17879800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of Compton background and breast compression on cancer detection in scintimammography.
    Pani R; Scopinaro F; Pellegrini R; Soluri A; Weinberg IN; De Vincentis G
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(3B):1645-9. PubMed ID: 9179211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions.
    Reece GP; Merchant F; Andon J; Khatam H; Ravi-Chandar K; Weston J; Fingeret MC; Lane C; Duncan K; Markey MK
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 25703742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging in large tissue volumes using a gain-modulated ICCD camera.
    Godavarty A; Eppstein MJ; Zhang C; Theru S; Thompson AB; Gurfinkel M; Sevick-Muraca EM
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1701-20. PubMed ID: 12870578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Characterizing the MTF in 3D for a Quantized SPECT Camera Having Arbitrary Trajectories.
    Madhav P; Bowsher JE; Cutler SJ; Tornai MP
    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2009 Jun; 56(3):661-670. PubMed ID: 21331301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Non-circular orbits for the reduction of uniformity artefacts in SPECT.
    Todd-Pokropek A
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Mar; 28(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 6601808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.
    Shen Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101915. PubMed ID: 24089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Emmons MM; Moss LJ; Hussain S; Baker SP
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4099-118. PubMed ID: 23685899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.
    Hruska CB; O'Connor MK
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):050901. PubMed ID: 23635248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.