These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16986160)

  • 1. Testing untyped alleles (TUNA)-applications to genome-wide association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):718-27. PubMed ID: 16986160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering.
    Browning BL; Browning SR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):365-75. PubMed ID: 17326099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exhaustive allelic transmission disequilibrium tests as a new approach to genome-wide association studies.
    Lin S; Chakravarti A; Cutler DJ
    Nat Genet; 2004 Nov; 36(11):1181-8. PubMed ID: 15502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using tree-based recursive partitioning methods to group haplotypes for increased power in association studies.
    Yu K; Xu J; Rao DC; Province M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):577-89. PubMed ID: 16138916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clustering of haplotypes based on phylogeny: how good a strategy for association testing?
    Bardel C; Darlu P; Génin E
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 14(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 16306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fine genetic mapping using haplotype analysis and the missing data problem.
    Chiano MN; Clayton DG
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9659978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ATRIUM: testing untyped SNPs in case-control association studies with related individuals.
    Wang Z; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 19913122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aspects of observing and claiming allele flips in association studies.
    Clarke GM; Cardon LR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 20013941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the use of DNA pooling to estimate haplotype frequencies.
    Wang S; Kidd KK; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 12508258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Navigating the HapMap.
    Barnes MR
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Sep; 7(3):211-24. PubMed ID: 16877472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating and improving power in whole-genome association studies using fixed marker sets.
    Pe'er I; de Bakker PI; Maller J; Yelensky R; Altshuler D; Daly MJ
    Nat Genet; 2006 Jun; 38(6):663-7. PubMed ID: 16715096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association studies for untyped markers with TUNA.
    Wen X; Nicolae DL
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):435-7. PubMed ID: 18057020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequencing drug response with HapMap.
    Lin M; Aquilante C; Johnson JA; Wu R
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2005; 5(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 15782224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new association test using haplotype similarity.
    Sha Q; Chen HS; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):577-93. PubMed ID: 17443704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.