411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16987843)
1. Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm?
Smith R
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 35(5):1129-30. PubMed ID: 16987843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific publishing. A call to improve South Africa's journals.
Koenig R
Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):831. PubMed ID: 16690829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A commentary on misuses of the impact factor.
Wróblewski AK
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 19043674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: the 'bibliographic impact factor' and the still uncharted sociology of epidemiology.
Porta M; Fernandez E; Bolúmar F
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 35(5):1130-5. PubMed ID: 16987846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Journal impact factor: a brief review.
Garfield E
CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):979-80. PubMed ID: 10551195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation.
Joseph KS; Hoey J
CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):977-8. PubMed ID: 10551194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bill would force journals to follow misconduct rules.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):7. PubMed ID: 1315423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are some categories of scientific publication more equal than others? On the ambiguous use of the label "original work".
Erren TC
Med Hypotheses; 2009 Mar; 72(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 19110382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals.
Hemmingsson A; Mygind T; Skjennald A; Edgren J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):767. PubMed ID: 11856721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact factors in scientific journals.
Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 May; 15(5):619. PubMed ID: 11997905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stop citing fraudulent and duplicate articles].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2007 May; 36(5 Pt 1):749-52. PubMed ID: 17398065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Does the impact factor the single suitable criteria to judge the quality of a scientific paper?].
Cynober L
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2002; 60(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 12050039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The characteristics of medical retraction notices.
Snodgrass GL; Pfeifer MP
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1992 Oct; 80(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 1422502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
