These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16988620)

  • 1. Magnetic properties of middle ear and stapes implants in a 9.4-T magnetic resonance field.
    Fritsch MH; Gutt JJ; Naumann IC
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1064-9. PubMed ID: 16988620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ferromagnetic movements of middle ear implants and stapes prostheses in a 3-T magnetic resonance field.
    Fritsch MH; Gutt JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 15793409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of MRI with metallic middle ear implants.
    Tohme SM; Karkas AA; Romanos BH
    J Med Liban; 2003; 51(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 15707072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How do metallic middle ear implants behave in the MRI?].
    Kwok P; Waldeck A; Strutz J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Jan; 82(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12548459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimum tension for partial ossicular replacement prosthesis reconstruction in the human middle ear.
    Morris DP; Bance M; van Wijhe RG; Kiefte M; Smith R
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Feb; 114(2):305-8. PubMed ID: 14755209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI information for commonly used otologic implants: review and update.
    Azadarmaki R; Tubbs R; Chen DA; Shellock FG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 150(4):512-9. PubMed ID: 24398365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on a new electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device.
    Hunyadi S; Werning JW; Lewin JS; Maniglia AJ
    Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 9149826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Metallic middle-ear implants in magnetic resonance tomography: hearing impairment and other hazards].
    Hüttenbrink KB
    Radiologe; 1987 Aug; 27(8):377-9. PubMed ID: 3659346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses.
    Syms AJ; Petermann GW
    Am J Otol; 2000 Jul; 21(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 10912693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comment on the contribution: The correlation of external magnetic fields and metallic middle ear implants by A. Schadel and R. Krämer in HNO (1989) 37:315-319].
    Hüttenbrink KB
    HNO; 1989 Dec; 37(12):522. PubMed ID: 2606744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety evaluation of titanium middle ear prostheses at 3.0 tesla.
    Martin AD; Driscoll CL; Wood CP; Felmlee JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 15806041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Interactions of external magnetic fields and metallic middle ear implants].
    Schadel A; Kremer R
    HNO; 1989 Aug; 37(8):315-9. PubMed ID: 2793529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis.
    Fritsch MH
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):733-8. PubMed ID: 17948354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vibratory sample magnetometry of middle ear prostheses and manufacturing materials.
    Syms MJ; Peterman DW
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jul; 22(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 11449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 12451586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Middle ear prosthesis displacement in high-strength magnetic fields.
    Williams MD; Antonelli PJ; Williams LS; Moorhead JE
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Mar; 22(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 11300262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does prosthesis head size affect vibration transmission in ossiculoplasty?
    Bance M; Campos A; Wong L; Morris DP; van Wijhe R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jul; 137(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 17599568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torque measurements of the ossicular chain: implication on the MRI safety of the hearing implant Vibrant Soundbridge.
    Jesacher MO; Kiefer J; Zierhofer C; Fauser C
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 20142797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
    Neudert M; Zahnert T; Lasurashvili N; Bornitz M; Lavcheva Z; Offergeld C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.