BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16988672)

  • 21. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
    Vences M; Zardoya R
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognition could support a science code of conduct.
    Ropert-Coudert Y
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):259. PubMed ID: 17507959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
    Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The road to fraud starts with a single step.
    Crocker J
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Named and shamed.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7092):392-3. PubMed ID: 16724027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
    Wada M
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Doubts over biochemist's data expose holes in Japanese fraud laws.
    Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):514. PubMed ID: 16452938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chinese law aims to quell fear of failure.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):12. PubMed ID: 17805265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Policing integrity.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Collaborations: investigating international misconduct.
    Boesz C; Lloyd N
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7188):686-7. PubMed ID: 18401384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Keep it clean.
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7360):251. PubMed ID: 21850063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate.
    New Atlantis; 2006; 11():113-7. PubMed ID: 16789313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
    Marín-Spiotta E
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Passive-smoking study faces review.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7133):242. PubMed ID: 17361147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.