These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16988895)

  • 1. Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.
    Pluhar EB
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(4):333-55. PubMed ID: 16988895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.
    Pluhar E
    J Agric Ethics; 1990; 3(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 11659306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?
    Dombrowski DA
    J Appl Philos; 2006; 23(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 17036431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral community and animal research in medicine.
    Frey RG
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 11655127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human and animal subjects of research: the moral significance of respect versus welfare.
    Walker RL
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(4):305-31. PubMed ID: 16937022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interests.
    Kuhse H
    J Med Ethics; 1985 Sep; 11(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 4057220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The harmful, nontherapeutic use of animals in research is morally wrong.
    Nobis N
    Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 21952174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Util-izing animals.
    LaFollette H; Shanks N
    J Appl Philos; 1995; 12(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 12416523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rights of humans and other animals.
    Regan T
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 11655125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal cases and moral relevance.
    Bernstein M
    J Soc Philos; 2002; 33(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 16619461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6483):1734-6. PubMed ID: 3924233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical considerations in painful animal research.
    Fox MA
    Adv Pain Res Ther; 1985; 9():685-94. PubMed ID: 11659068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The question is not, "can they talk"?
    Namkoong G; Regan T
    J Med Philos; 1988 May; 13(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 3418249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review.
    DeGrazia D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Mar; 1(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 11645700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The moral standing of animals in medical research.
    Beauchamp TL
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 1630145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights?
    Beauchamp TL
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11655126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral community and the responsibility of scientists.
    Caplan A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):78-90. PubMed ID: 11650004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of nonhuman animals in biomedical research: necessity and justification.
    Francione GL
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 17518849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinctive moralities: the value of life and our duties to the handicapped.
    Ramsay H
    J Value Inq; 1998 Dec; 32(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 15295853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking the morality of animal research.
    Tannenbaum J; Rowan AN
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Oct; 15(5):32-43. PubMed ID: 3905706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.