These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16989040)

  • 1. The Canadian perspective: trends in drug and medical device class actions in Canada.
    Vernon W
    Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 16989040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pin the tail on the other donkey: allocating and avoiding injury losses after drug or device approval.
    O'Reilly JT
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):559-72. PubMed ID: 17915397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of FDA reform.
    Trunzo J
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 12789699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The FDA defense: a prescription for easing the pain of punitive damage awards in medical products liability cases.
    Marthaler AL
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Sep; (223):9-45. PubMed ID: 10173273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976.
    Petrella ME
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ejecting the FDA from the courtroom.
    Lancet; 2004 Aug 21-27; 364(9435):638. PubMed ID: 15325808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
    Jarcho DG
    Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
    Neraas MB
    Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court, preemption, and malpractice liability.
    Kesselheim AS; Studdert DM
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 19196672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions.
    Gross JM; Curry JA
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 43(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 18354866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shrinking waters in the safe harbor: has Integra Lifesciences v. Merck turned the tide by narrowing available exempted infringing uses?
    Davison AM
    Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 15190926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why doctors should worry about preemption.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Jul; 359(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18596269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety.
    Kesselheim AS
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 20485322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The preemptive scope of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976.
    Sunshine PH
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 10342991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal overprotection.
    Friedman JH
    Med Health R I; 2004 Oct; 87(10):294. PubMed ID: 15559378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who should protect the public? The Supreme Court and medical device regulation.
    Korobkin R
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(17):1680-1. PubMed ID: 17960010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bad medicine: prescription drugs, preemption, and the potential for a no-fault fix.
    Smirniotopoulos A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2012; 35(4):793-862. PubMed ID: 22363960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Insuring" the continued solvency of pharmaceutical companies in the face of product liability class actions.
    Chodock R; Yolkut D; Connolly DR
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2005; 40(3):997-1017. PubMed ID: 16100814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal pre-emption under the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act from Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr; Pliva. Inc. v. Mensing.
    Ball FR
    Health Care Law Mon; 2011 Sep; 2011(9):2-8. PubMed ID: 21949984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulators need to regulate. For health and safety issues, the nation needs watchdogs to be on guard.
    May D
    Mod Healthc; 2010 Mar; 40(9):16. PubMed ID: 20344831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.