These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16989221)

  • 1. [A method for calculation of the absorbed dose].
    Griaznov AIu; Potrakhov NN
    Med Tekh; 2006; (4):23-7. PubMed ID: 16989221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation doses from low energy X-ray beams measured with synthetic diamond compared with calculated values obtained from the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code.
    Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Aug; 65(8):952-8. PubMed ID: 17482827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of coincidence summing corrections for X-ray peaks and for sum peaks with X-ray contributions.
    Arnold D; Sima O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1297-302. PubMed ID: 16678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A calculation model for primary intensity distributions from cylindrically symmetric x-ray lenses.
    Hristov D; Maltz J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):515-27. PubMed ID: 18199899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainties in alanine/ESR dosimetry at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.
    Anton M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5419-40. PubMed ID: 17047261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
    Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interlaboratory comparison and accreditation in quality control testing of diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A; Servomaa A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15933108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Determination of the energy of nonmonoenergetic radiation].
    Karpova IA; Leshchinskiĭ NI; Nikulin IuP; Sverchkova NV
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1977 May; 22(5):82-4. PubMed ID: 875670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of x-ray spectra from Al attenuation data by imposing a priori physical features of the spectrum: theory and experimental validation.
    Delgado V
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 19235383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation of calibrated tungsten target x-ray spectra: modified TBC model.
    Costa PR; Nersissian DY; Salvador FC; Rio PB; Caldas LV
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17164596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of photon attenuation coefficient, porosity and field capacity of soil by gamma-ray transmission for 60, 356 and 662 keV gamma rays.
    Demir D; Un A; Ozgül M; Sahin Y
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1834-7. PubMed ID: 18554919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photon extremity absorbed dose and kerma conversion coefficients for calibration geometries.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17220720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities.
    Irving BJ; Maree GJ; Hering ER; Douglas TS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 18420566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of the detective efficiency of X-ray diagnostic systems by visual assessment of the maximal resolution].
    Vladimirov LV; Kanter BM; Kozlov AA; Lygin VA
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 16285239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
    Jarry G; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new NMi orthovolt x-rays absorbed dose to water primary standard based on water calorimetry.
    de Prez LA; de Pooter JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3531-42. PubMed ID: 18552419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Spectral distribution of radiation and the spectra of the linear energy transfer of long-wave x-ray radiation].
    Grammatikati VS; Radzievskiĭ GB; Savel'ev GI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1977 May; 22(5):74-81. PubMed ID: 875669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.