BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16989541)

  • 21. [Ghostwriting].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
    Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
    HEART Group
    Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Responsibilities of the editor.
    Punjabi PP
    Perfusion; 2010 May; 25(3):113-4. PubMed ID: 20581024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comments on "The corporate author".
    Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M; Mitrany D; Foote MA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Oct; 20(10):972; author reply 972-3. PubMed ID: 16191155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. You're a published author!
    Tompkins O
    AAOHN J; 2010 Aug; 58(8):315. PubMed ID: 20812397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit.
    Bearinger LH; Taliaferro L; Given B
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Oct; 33(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 20827742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Disclosure on author work effort.
    Goetz CG; Deuschl G
    Mov Disord; 2007 Oct; 22(14):1989. PubMed ID: 17969060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
    Bergström R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
    Laube RE
    BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editorial policy: industry funding and editorial independence.
    MacDonald N; Downie J
    CMAJ; 2006 Jun; 174(13):1817, 1819. PubMed ID: 16785448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies.
    World Association of Medical Editors
    J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):549. PubMed ID: 15987333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical reviews face criticism over lapses.
    Armstrong D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Jul; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 16909499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scientists urge journal policy on disclosures.
    Petersen M
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Aug; ():A17. PubMed ID: 14515837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When a journal cannot stand behind a published paper.
    Guidotti TL
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2005; 60(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 17153083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conflicts of interest and disclosures in publications.
    Camilleri M; Dubnansky EC; Rustgi AK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 17368225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. More steps needed to tackle authors who do not respond.
    Bavdekar SB; Karande S
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Apr; 43(4):371-2. PubMed ID: 16651685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.