These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16990229)

  • 1. Clinical field testing of polyurethane feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries.
    Steen Jensen J; Nilsen R; Thanh NH; Saldana A; Hartz C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Aug; 30(2):182-94. PubMed ID: 16990229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical field testing of vulcanized rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries.
    Steen Jensen J; Nilsen R; Zeffer J; Fisk J; Hartz C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Aug; 30(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 16990230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 17365891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17162513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary experiences with modified SACH feet manufactured and used in a tropical developing world setting.
    Jensen JS; Heim S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Dec; 23(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 10890600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Craig JG; Mtalo LB; Zelaya CM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Dec; 28(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 15658636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic foot roll-over shapes with implications for alignment of trans-tibial prostheses.
    Hansen AH; Childress DS; Knox EH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Dec; 24(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11195355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Aug; 26(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 12227454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analyses of prosthetic episodes in trans-tibial amputees.
    Datta D; Vaidya SP; Alsindi Z
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10355638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy expenditure of walking with prostheses: comparison of three amputation levels.
    Göktepe AS; Cakir B; Yilmaz B; Yazicioglu K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20196687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peak pressure data and pressure-time integral in the contralateral limb in patients with diabetes and a trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Borg J; Mizzi S; Formosa C
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():55-58. PubMed ID: 29857262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Jaipur foot.
    Arya AP; Klenerman L
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1414-6. PubMed ID: 18978257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Satisfaction rates amongst elderly amputees provided with a static prosthetic foot.
    Dudkiewicz I; Pisarenko B; Herman A; Heim M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(21-22):1963-7. PubMed ID: 21303214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality benchmark for trans-tibial prostheses in low-income countries.
    Jensen JS; Nilsen R; Zeffer J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16180377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
    Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston AA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 24301431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical field testing of trans-femoral prosthetic technologies: resin-wood and ICRC-polypropylene.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 'shape&roll' prosthetic foot: II. Field testing in El Salvador.
    Meier MR; Sam M; Hansen AH; Childress DS
    Med Confl Surviv; 2004; 20(4):307-25. PubMed ID: 15688882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-femoral amputees.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Apr; 27(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 12812328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees.
    Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.